Plans for a network of industrial-scale poultry farms and slaughterhouses in central Croatia would reshape the region far beyond agriculture. Proposed facilities would process hundreds of millions of chickens each year, a level of concentration that raises urgent questions about animal welfare, environmental strain, and democratic oversight.
According to information compiled by Animal Friends Croatia, the projects cluster hatcheries, feed factories, farms, and slaughterhouses into one tightly linked system. This structure prioritizes output and cost efficiency. It also magnifies harm when something goes wrong.
Animals Treated as Units, Not Living Beings
At this scale, welfare protections thin out. Millions of birds would be raised in dense confinement, a model long associated with chronic stress, restricted movement, and routine antibiotic use. Poultry World describes facilities designed to house millions of chickens in hundreds of sheds, integrated with on-site slaughter. Such systems leave little room for humane handling or meaningful oversight.
The model differs sharply from European consumer expectations that favor lower densities and higher welfare standards. Once established, reversing these conditions becomes nearly impossible.
Water, Waste, and Irreversible Pollution
Environmental pressure forms the second fault line. One proposed facility alone would consume nearly half a million cubic meters of water annually, while generating wastewater, ammonia emissions, and manure volumes that exceed what local land and waterways can absorb.
Animal Friends Croatia warns that several sites sit close to drinking-water sources, schools, and protected natural areas. Runoff and air pollution would not stop at fence lines. Wildlife habitats, soil quality, and groundwater face long-term degradation.
A System That Rarely Says No
These projects rely on environmental impact assessments to move forward. Yet investigations by Balkan Insight show that Croatia’s assessment process often favors investors. Most large projects receive approval, sometimes after studies that overlook cumulative effects or exclude interconnected facilities from total capacity calculations.
When developments proceed as separate applications, their combined footprint disappears on paper. On the ground, communities experience the full burden.
Patterns Repeated Across Sectors
The same approval dynamics appear in other environmentally sensitive projects. Balkan Insight documents how coastal ecosystems gained legal protection yet continued to be opened to intensive development through procedural shortcuts.
This context matters. Mega slaughterhouses do not exist in isolation. They emerge within a regulatory culture where economic scale often outweighs ecological limits.
Local Opposition, European Implications
Residents in affected Croatian regions have organized protests and filed objections, citing health risks and loss of quality of life. Their resistance reflects more than local concern. By producing poultry inside the EU, foreign-owned conglomerates can bypass trade limits that apply to imports, as Poultry World notes, reshaping European markets while externalizing environmental and ethical costs.
The Question That Remains
Mega slaughterhouse projects promise jobs and investment. What they also bring is concentrated suffering, lasting pollution, and a testing ground for how much strain rural communities and animals are expected to endure.
Once built, the damage cannot be undone. The decision facing Croatia is not only about agriculture. It is about whether industrial efficiency justifies permanent harm to animals, ecosystems, and the people who live among them.
Click below to make a difference.
